What is it?
The Jaguar F-Type 2.0-litre is described as “the feisty young brother” by Jaguar. Which is both encouraging and slightly worrying. Have you ever spent any time around a younger brother who could broadly be defined as ‘feisty’? Annoying, isn’t he?
But, yes, it sounds encouraging, too. The F-Type 2.0-litre marks the arrival of Jaguar’s four-cylinder Ingenium engine in 296bhp petrol form, so here it gets plonked into Jaguar’s sports-GT car. You could think of it as downsizing – which usually turns out okay, as with Ferrari and Mercedes-AMG, for example – but sometimes doesn’t. There’s the reassurance here that, if you don’t like it, the bigger engines, V6s and V8s, stay on sale, too.
You might remember the ‘four-cylinder engine in a six-cylinder car’ idea from such projects as ‘the Porsche 718 Cayman’. The biggest problem with the four-pot in the German car is the way it sounds.
A single tailpipe, rather than several, visually marks the 2.0 as it drops into the front of an F-Type. It drives the rear wheels only, and through an eight-speed automatic gearbox only. There’s no four-wheel drive or manual ’box option for the 2.0. Jaguar’s engineers decline to say if they’ve tried a manual. It wouldn’t surprise me if they had, and I’m sure it’d be even lighter again than this car – which is 52kg lighter than the V6. But while a light, stripped-out, manual variant sounds the kind of car that people like us love, it also sounds like one nobody would buy.
The 52kg reduction here pretty much all comes in the nose. When we road tested a V6 Jaguar F-Type, we found it weighed 1755kg, of which 52% was over the front, so although the four-pot will remain very marginally forward biased, it should make a sizeable difference to the way it drives.
Jaguar’s engineers will discreetly tell you that this is their preferred F-Type when it comes to handling, in the same way that, with the old XK, the 5.0-litre naturally aspirated V8 was preferable to the supercharged cars, because it was quick enough yet felt that bit more agile when you turned.
Jaguar We’re testing a coupé although a convertible (only 20kg heavier, it’s claimed) is available, too. As standard, you get 18in wheels – again, a format that dynamics engineers quite like – but go for R Dynamic trim, which this is, rather than the base model, and you get 19s, with 20s an option. What the 2.0 also doesn’t get is adaptive dampers. But, again, there’s the engineering wink and nod: this car’s just dandy without them.
Join the debate
Add your comment
I think people are losing the
I think people are losing the culture of mechanical music...
They have just to put a screaming sound in the loudspeakers and the that's it.
Neighbour has the 3.0 Convertible...
TBH, it is loud in the morning on start up. Not particulalry very cultured or thrilling but loud. It's the V6 of course but its still a bit bland. My old Yamaha V8 in the Volvo sounds far nicer first thing although its encased by a somewhat boring looking body in comparison to his Jag!
Hmm, the 4 cyl is a bit of a faux par at this price. The only interesting 4 cyl engines in the last 20 years or so have been the Subaru Boxers and Alfa's Twin Spark units. Yes, BM have made some lovely sweet spinning ones along with Honda, but none with great Character (although the Honda's VTECs do get close). 4's just dont have it.
It may be quick, it may be a hoot but at this price and with that badge you want a soundtrack of at least the 6 (although I'm not impressed after 2 years of hearing it daily) or 8 (the way to go really) to accompany you.
Thats my opinion anyway...
The sound is also artificial
The sound is also artificial from the speakers by BMW and M...
The sound of the M4 is quite vulgar outside.
RIP BMW and M.
david RS wrote:
Exactly. Also, various VW/Audi Group cars fake the sound. Disgusting.
david RS wrote:
Exactly. Same for various VW-Audi Group cars. Disgusting.