The recent spat at the Geneva motor show between Aston Martin and Rolls-Royce was a most un-English outburst.
Aston’s unexpected reveal of the electric Lagonda super-luxury concept was accompanied by a direct denunciation of Rolls-Royce’s future as the ‘pinnacle of luxury’ by the brand’s chief creative officer, Marek Reichman.
Reichman described Rolls-Royce as “the most luxurious car in the world” but then qualified that by suggesting its time was running out. “Given its roots, its reason for being, it’s essentially still an internal combustion engine to replace a horse, a carriage and a trunk. It’s an imperfect package for luxury,” he said.

“Rolls-Royce and Bentley are Ancient Greece today. I worked on the original Phantom. The brief was ‘Buckingham Palace on wheels’. It was important to do that to establish it. But the world has changed, and the royals have changed.”
Reichman also predicted that “the [automotive] world will be more extreme, and customers expect it. You can’t see Apple or Google executives in a Rolls-Royce Phantom. You can see them in this [a Lagonda].”
It’s exceptionally rare for one car maker to so directly attack another, especially in a way that suggests Rolls-Royce – as currently configured – does not have bright future ahead of it. Reichman’s punchiness might have hit even harder at Rolls-Royce because he was on the original Phantom design team, which was billeted in a disused bank overlooking Hyde Park Corner.

At the same Geneva show, Rolls-Royce boss Torsten Müller-Ötvös told the Financial Times that Aston “really don’t understand our segment, they really don’t understand the customers... they are in a complete different league on pricing, they have zero clue what’s going on in the upper, upper segment – zero.”







