When the automotive industry has made the national headlines in recent years, it’s rarely been for positive reasons.
The latest example of this has been the expansion of the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) in London, an environmental policy that’s already onto a loser in the popularity stakes by hitting people in their pockets.
Could the vociferous negative reaction to ULEZ that’s now spilled onto the streets with protests (and even seen cameras chopped down) be repeated as we head towards the government’s ban on the sale of internal combustion-engined vehicles in the next decade?
An expanded ULEZ is something we’ve known has been coming for a long time, yet as the date loomed the debate around it only gained in intensity as it dawned on people the policy really was going to start costing them money.
The 2030 ban has a longer run-in, yet here again we have an environmental policy that’s going to put a dent in voters’ wallets. While EVs surely will end up achieving cost parity with their ICE equivalents, the collateral damage has already been done: smaller, more affordable new cars are already a near-extinct breed, as they are no longer economical (or indeed profitable) for car makers. Investments have instead been diverted into battery-electric vehicles and something has had to give.
The crux of the opposition to ULEZ is that it’s seen as a tax on the poor, those unable to afford compliant vehicles, and the argument around the 2030 ban as its introduction comes over the horizon could quite easily follow a similar path.
The usual ‘well, you can always buy used’ argument undermines the very premise of the policy in the first place - and don’t forget that the government has still yet to reveal how it will fund the multi-billion tax shortfall from a fall in fuel duty revenue as more EVs take to the road. Don’t be surprised to simply see fuel duty increased over the next decade. Such a move would do wonders for the popularity of EVs amongst those that can’t afford them, no doubt…
Join the debate
Add your comment
Completely agree with contributor about a £500 Fiesta being ULEZ compliant. There are many cheap cars that provide reliable and safe transport. Prices are still seriously skewed by lack of supply of new cars but hopefully this should improve in 2024.
As car enthusiasts we can also be environmentally conscious. Vehicle fumes seriously effect the health of some children in cities - so I support the increase in ULEZ zones and the promotion of EVs. It's also reasonable that low volume manufacturers of high performance petrol vehicles are exempt eg Aston Martin, Caterham, Arial etc. these companies provide Jobs and valuable R&D. The cars are essentially toys/ Sunday cars and do few miles every year.
I have little doubt that the Government linking annual Road Tax to CO2 emissions encouraged manufacturers of large SUVs to improve their engines to emit less CO2. Who wants to pay £500 pa? Also helps Ozone Layer.
The role of the manufacturers deserves inspection - as reported in Autocar recently :- in 2008 it was possible to buy the 4 cheapest cars in UK for less than £8k - the same cars now cost c£15k - nearly double -OK their costs have risen significantly but surely the manufacturers and dealers are 'milking' the situation?
There's no ICE ban in 2030. You will still be able to buy ICE until 2035, it just must be a hybrid.
Please attempt to get it right!
And as for ULEZ compliant vehicles you can buy a 2005 Ford Fiesta from £500. ULEZ compliant. I mean come on Autocar.