I'd like to congratulate those of you planning to properly ‘restomod’ your classic. And equally, well done anybody who desires not a screwhead less than complete originality.
Unlike me, you know what you’re trying to achieve, and so this column isn’t aimed at you. This column is for the people trying to navigate through the murky area between reinventing their classic cars wholesale and going entirely by the book. And whether because of cash, personal philosophy, availability of parts or a combination of all three, I suspect that’s most of us.
So, now you're stuck at home and with time aplenty for fettling and scouring eBay for parts, what I want to know is how far you lean towards either extreme, and whether or not unlimited funds would prompt you to lean even further.
If, say, you could afford to transform your slightly crusty but largely authentic Porsche 964 into a gleaming 4.0-litre Singer, would you? Knowing the driving experience of your GT Junior could be made more enjoyable with some targeted modifications, could you honestly stick to your guns and keep it completely original? Answers in the comments, please.
I’ll go first because I think mine is a familiar story. My natural tendency is indeed to keep things original. That was, and vaguely still is, the plan with my eight-valve Integrale. I like the idea of driving it and experiencing the exact same sights, sounds, sensations and smells as the person who shelled out £17,625 (though I can't quite believe it, this equates to £47,600 today) in 1990.
Likewise, imagine you’re driving a time-warp Lotus Elan down dusty country roads lit only by its crummy halogen lamps. What you've essentially done is teleport yourself back to 1962 at the wheel of one of the world’s most covetable and advanced sports cars, and who wouldn’t want to experience that?
Point being, a perfectly original car – and by that I also mean one's awareness that the car is so – can take you to a special place. The problem, as ever, is that the idea of keeping your car in the same specification in which it left the factory gates is usually sweeter than the reality.
Which is where the cheating begins, and it always starts small. My Lancia has polyurethane bushes that are much better than the original, porridge-spec rubber ones. And while the original brake calipers remain, the car uses modern Brembo discs and Ferodo pads. Neither is much of a departure from original spec, though, and both are justifiable in terms of safety. No big deal.
But I've also got a dished aftermarket Momo steering wheel. It's smaller in diameter than the standard rim and therefore makes the rack feel quicker, and it also allows me to slide the seat further back and improve the terrible driving position. These things are important to me, but between the wheel and the new Ragazzon exhaust, we're already on shakier ground.
However, the car still continues to look almost entirely original, despite now driving better and, yes, it still feels very like an Integrale. Not necessarily a humble eight-valve Integrale, admittedly, as I've fitted both the coil springs and the gearshift from the Final Edition Evo models, which improve the driving experience no end, and… Well, you can see what's happened.
This is classic classic-car mission creep, and the thing is morphing – deceptively slowly, much like Mrs Twit's walking stick – into something it never really was. I'd quite like to fit a cross-brace beneath the engine bay to cut out some flex and improve turn-in, but that's a fairly big undertaking, and where then? Öhlins coilovers so that the body control is better not only than what Lancia could deliver back in the day, but also than what even Porsche could deliver for the 959?
Inevitably, by steadily optimising the driving experience you move it away from what it was suppossed to be. For the better? If you're sensible, that's not hard to achieve, and I have no doubt my Integrale will eventually offer up a truly special and rare driving experience (frankly, it already does) but I wonder where I'll draw the line. Could it become, um, too good?
After all, much as I'll drool over the likes of an Automobili Amos Integrale, the reason I bought a 1990 Lancia Delta Integrale was because I wanted to own and drive a 1990 Lancia Delta Integrale. Well, at least that was the plan.
READ MORE
The best cars from the classic rebuild industry
Porsche offers modern infotainment upgrades for classic 911s
Throwback: 1967 Alfa Romeo GTA first drive
Join the debate
Add your comment
Fascinating blog, thank you.
Fascinating blog, thank you.
I agree that rarity is a very important factor - there is a real value in keeping classic cars in original condition, not just for the current owner or custodian but for car fans everywhere. The compromises forced upon the development of any particular car are part of the story.
However, most car owners are not museum owners or interested in concours events, but want to enjoy their cars. In which case: it's up to them!
Build what you like, but be sensitive
Its your car, do what you like. I go Ford shows and i love to see what people have done to both a mint concourse mk1 1300E and the guy who shoehorned a Honda S2000 engine into a Mk2 Fiesta. For me persoanlly its playing nice together. My Mk1 Capri was a shell and destined for the scrap heap, so I stuck a fibreglass colonge kit on it, a Jag XKR axle at the back and a Cosworth V6 upfront along with pretty much everything else on the car. The spares that came with it, the seats, steering wheel, etc, were all in good nick, so I stuck them all on ebay at 99p bidding and let the people who were restoring have them. I get the car I want, they get the car they want. We can all be happy.
Depends a bit on the car
If the car was plentiful and relatively inexpensive I'm all for modifying (albeit tastefully), but I can understand people's reticence about changing something rare.
It's easy for me as my car is an Eunos, of which there remain thousands. If I ever wanted to return it to stock it would be relatively cheap and easy. Not that there would be a lot of point. Mine is now much faster, handles and rides better, is more comfortable and essentially looks stock and retains the essence of MX5. That's the right balance for me, but I know it would upset some and bore others.