Comparison: Renault Twingo versus Volkswagen Up

The Up’s cause, at least in this case, isn't helped by its design’s stodgy accommodation of rear doors. 

The running order, however, is reversed once inside. Even in its playfully two-tone, top-spec Dynamique trim, the Renault is no match for Volkswagen’s mastery of material choice and build quality. Where its surfaces are hard and hollow to the touch, the Up’s plastic fascia thuds under knuckle like a safe door.

The Twingo receives plenty of digital trickery – including an impressively large infotainment screen – yet there’s no room for a revcounter in the instrument cluster, and silly ergonomic flaws, such as the removable storage bin removing itself on first encounter with a kneecap, are of precisely the sort that Volkswagen doesn’t make. 

Subjectively, the Twingo is as spacious as the Up both front and back. Normally that would be high praise, but given its more exotic configuration and a slightly longer wheelbase, I was expecting the Twingo to deliver a discernible advantage. In terms of practicality, there isn’t much to choose between them.

Four adults will fit snugly into both, and while the boots are clearly differently proportioned (the Up’s being deep and narrow, the Twingo’s shallow and long), there isn’t as much of a gulf between them as the VW’s higher on-paper volume suggests. 

Both employ front MacPherson struts and rear torsion beams, and both are powered by three-pot petrol engines. Tested here in their more powerful guises, the Up’s naturally aspirated 1.0-litre unit produces 74bhp, while Renault’s 0.9-litre motor delivers 89bhp courtesy of a turbocharger.

Running costs are closely matched, each besting 60mpg combined, with a difference of only 9g/km in CO2 emissions (the Twingo going duty-free). On the scales, barely 15kg separates them. 

Turn the ignition on, though, and the similarities melt away. A vocal, reedy pit-a-pat passes through both cabins, but the greater distance to the Twingo’s motor is palpable – like sitting forward of the jet engines in an Airbus. Neither engine revs particularly freely, and they are similarly recalcitrant beneath 3000rpm.

But while the Up must be tenaciously wound up just to keep pace with the traffic ahead, a floored throttle in the Renault will have you at risk of rear-ending it. With almost 30lb ft extra at its disposal, the whistling, trilling French motor leans into the first four of its five long ratios with noticeably more urgency than the Up – a quality measurable in a near-2.5sec advantage to 62mph and unmistakable in its greater overtaking potential.

Having waded through half of France at a middling plod, the added energy ought to make the Twingo a more invigorating prospect around town. Sporadically it does, but there are limiting factors at play here, not least that the Renault is a rather curious concoction with which to get to grips.

Read the full Volkswagen Up review

It’s not necessary to have driven the Up moments before in order to notice the Twingo’s unusual steering. With no engine to weigh the nose down and a full 3.5 turns required to go from lock to lock (even with the marginally quicker variable-ratio rack fitted to the range-topper), Renault has downgraded the resistance to bumper car levels of heft.

Even small adjustments necessitate applying half a crank of input, but the upside is that, with the helm on full lock either way, the wheels are pointing at 45deg from the body, which results in a turning circle that puts even the highly manoeuvrable Up to shame.

The downside is that if you’re the kind of guy who likes to see Nantes with one hand affixed to 12 o’clock, you’re going to find yourself working at it like a dump truck driver. 

The Up is much less effort, and what it gives up in U-turning prowess, it more than makes up for in sprightly lane-changing agility. Inevitably, with the Twingo so devoid of feedback, the Up also does a better job of communicating the tyres’ work rate out of town.

The lack of immediate bite is disconcerting in the Renault, especially when you’re already winding on more lock than usual. The decision to tune armfuls of understeer into the rear-drive chassis doesn’t help, nor does it make much sense when you discover that the non-switchable stability control has an incredibly stringent, progress-stalling reaction to any detected loss of traction. 

Adopting impatient commuter speed back in Nantes, it’s clear that there’s an element of fuss in driving the Twingo that simply isn’t present in the Up.

Keener pedallers will probably find themselves working at some sort of half-speed, low-rate frenzy, one minute twirling the steering wheel like a marching baton, the next working feverishly through the tall gearlever’s long, bony action to keep the three-pot warbling.

It’s remarkable, really, that it doesn’t immediately become an irritation, and the fact that I found myself sporadically invested in the hectic thrum, mucking in with the car’s flighty character without feeling the need to continually admonish it, speaks volumes.

It helps that the Twingo generally rides with the kind of happy-go-lucky pliancy that allows it to bob over sleeping policemen and leapfrog kerbs. There isn’t the measured, big-car compliance of the Up – the preloaded torsion bar gets a bit grisly when faced with more serious intrusions – but obvious chinks in its armour are the exception rather than the rule. 

The verdict

So what we’ve got here is, in part, what we asked for. As a counterpoint to the Up’s benign and incorruptible polish, the Twingo is impeccable – not least because it’s so quaintly flawed.

The good qualities are obvious enough and convincing when listed: it’s as practical as the Volkswagen, prettier, cheaper (by over £600 at the comparable trim levels tested), quicker (without being any less kind to your wallet) and, in Dynamique format, very well equipped.

Not everyone is going to like it, though, given the zeal with which Renault has snuffed out the rear-drive dynamic that might have made it compelling, only to replace it with a needlessly anodyne sense of balance.

Its handling, refinement, comfort, quality and arguably value are a distant second to the Up and ensure it remains inferior in our reckoning. But through the cracks of its not quite joined-up thinking, there’s a memorable and characterful car in the Twingo – one that, conceivably, with the right owner, might be worthy of the affection we’ve typically withheld from the Up.